Book's out. If you read it and like it, a nice rating and possibly a few words about it would be swell. Thanks. https://www.amazon.ca/Death-Dead-Cortisol-Control-Healthy/dp/B0HPYLLTZ5/
Cal Chayce
Saturday, 14 November 2026
Monday, 18 September 2023
Wednesday, 26 October 2016
Tuesday, 26 July 2016
Tuesday, 3 March 2015
Updated Reviews
Selected Praise
Labels:
stories
***
"Brimming with well-observed critiques of modern life, Victor of Circumstance has some laugh-out-loud moments and satire reminiscent of John Kennedy Toole."
~Mark A. Rayner, author of The Fridgularity
=
Eerie, sad, dark, liberating, redemptive, all of
it. Great story! There are so many good things going on with this one
that I have to try to put them into a succinct fashion.
=
Man, I got chills.
=
This piece of art is absolutely phenomenal. Good. Freakin'. Job!
=
Well done. (And you've just acquired a new fan!)
=
Great piece
=
I really loved the intensity that just exploded off the page
=
The story is real and the subject matter is so relevant it's terrifying.
=
I enjoyed this short story very much!
=
You really nailed this one.
=
A wonderful job. You get all A's from me. I have always enjoyed your stories. I look forward to the next one.
=
You did an amazing job capturing a very difficult topic.
=
wonderfully written.
=
Wow! Bravo!
=
...but
one, like this one, comes along with the deep underlining theme of
atonement and love and forgiveness that warms the heart and brings an
awe of the author's talent.
=
I can’t begin to explain the many different levels of excellence I find in this piece.
=
This
story had me bawling! I don’t like to cry but I loved this story. You
did a great job in building sympathy for the main character and in
slowly revealing his story.
=
Great job!!
=
The
story has some truly heart rending scenes. The author very effectively,
and at the right time, reveals to the readers what is driving the main
character
=
Wow.
This is one of the best stories on here! There are so many important
aspects of life described and you are drawn in to an amazing, realistic
journey. I highly recommend this story and hope the author continues to
write.
=
This is a beautiful story. Beautiful, despite its horrors.
=
You clearly have the gift of observing and drawing on real life to write compelling stories with a very strong hand.
=
Very Powerful
=
I
was strongly affected by this story. There were parts that brought
tears to my eyes; parts that broke my heart; and parts that disturbed
me. Good job!
=
What a terrible, utterly realistic tale.
=
The way you described things was painfully
real. You did an excellent job capturing the hatred and the fear and
the helpless feelings that surround that type of situation.
=
let me say this about the story; it is superb
=
truly a marvelous, gritty story, a well-described, sometimes harrowing, sometimes funny, but always engaging story.
=
Wow. This was a very, very good short story.
=
I enjoy dark, alternative, and unique stories, so this was a good read for me.
=
Great
Storytelling - It comes through loud and clear that you're a gifted
storyteller. I've reviewed literally hundreds of works and yours was one
of only a handful where I turned the page, not because it was assigned
to me, but because I was genuinely engrossed.
=
I consider this a first class effort.
=
This is a well written gritty dramatic piece
=
Emotionally charged and well contrasted story
=
the message in this story is beautiful. I think you really are a talented writer.
=
This was a long short story, but I enjoyed every minute of it, well thought
out, and structured just so sweetly. a good story, very well told.
out, and structured just so sweetly. a good story, very well told.
=
This
is a well written, fast paced read. The story that was told is a real
tear jerker. The situation was real and the telling was real.
=
I
got comfortable with my special reading glasses a cup of tea and my
comforter, and anticipated a great treat as the writer’s reputation
preceded him.
=
This was an excellent character study. The subtle, emerging portraits were especially well-written. Very good writing!
=
Thank you for the opportunity to read this fine piece. The writing flowed easily and the word choice was quite pleasing.
=
What
a wonderful,wonderful slice of life. You've captured a mood and a
moment here that is both moving and recognizable to anyone who has ever
been in a difficult relationship. This is a very nice piece of work.
=
stands out with the best I've read. I find so well written that I'd like to strangle the author out of sheer jealousy!
=
What
a lovely and touching story. You did a wonderful job capturing the
initial loneliness and hurt. I empathized with your character, there
were times I even felt his pain. Your imagery was beautiful.
=
Terrific. The setting is fantastic and worked well in this story.
=
thoughtfully
beautiful - I did truly enjoy this short story. It was beautifully
descriptive, not only in actually describing things, but for the level
of how the reader can feel this man's pain, pride, sense of
accomplishment and regret.
=
A really lovely story - The story kept me reading the whole way though
=
very well done. Bravo!
=
A nicely constructed, thought provoking, very enjoyable read.
A pleasure to read a piece that shows an apprecation for words, sentences, paragraphs and grammar. Beautifully done, thanks for a clear, bright, shining picture.
A pleasure to read a piece that shows an apprecation for words, sentences, paragraphs and grammar. Beautifully done, thanks for a clear, bright, shining picture.
=
Well, the end brought a tear to my eye, so it must be good! Very good read :)
=
A fine effort at existentialist literature.
=
What a touching story! The structure was superb as well. Great job!
=
Good job - this story rocks. I love the word choices and how they are used.
There is no dull moment. Starting from paragraph one you know this is going to be good. You keep going and it keeps getting better. I totally ate this story up. Thank you for the great story.
There is no dull moment. Starting from paragraph one you know this is going to be good. You keep going and it keeps getting better. I totally ate this story up. Thank you for the great story.
=
a neatly told story, quite impressive indeed
=
Exceptional.
There is something special about this short that certainly struck a
chord with me. I’m sure there are others who will be touched by it. Your
writing is punchy, colorful, and creative. The visuals are striking and
carry a double meaning that’s apparent on first reading. Truly an
enjoyable read.
=
This
story had such a great feel to it. The reader experiences a real
empathy with the writer. well written clear and evocative. Well done
thoroughly enjoyed it.
Tuesday, 27 May 2014
Stars and Other Monsters review
Title: Stars
and Other Monsters
Author:
Phronk
Publisher: Forest
City Pulp
Release:
(paperback and digital) Friday, 13 June, 2014
Official:
fuckvampires.com
Available now at Amazon.
Let me say off the start that I despise vampire stories. I’ve enjoyed,
perhaps, three of them over the years (Dracula, Salem’s Lot, Children of The
Night), and been disappointed innumerable times. There is one thing worse than vampire
stories, however, and that’s light-hearted and comical vampire stories. Stars and Other Monsters by
Phronk is a light-hearted and comical vampire story. And, somehow, against all
odds, I thoroughly enjoyed every page of it.
The story involves a wicked and slimy creature that prowls the night,
seeking out unwitting victims. Is it necessarily evil, though? After all, it is
merely trying to survive. It must surreptitiously stalk its prey, track it
down, and take its picture so it can sell the photos to magazines — and then he
meets a vampire. The reader is left to ponder if one is worse than the other: if
they’re both degenerate parasites, or simply misunderstood by humans. Maybe they have more in common than either would have imagined, and maybe
they are both more human than we think.
The vampire solicits the aid of the photographer (and his little dog,
too) in her quest to find a film star with whom she’s become rather smitten. The
photog decides to assist her, as not doing so would result in his gruesome
death, and together they embark upon a journey up through the Western U.S. and
Canada in search of her hunky obsession. The trials they encounter along the way are
one thing; what they find at the climax of their adventure is quite another.
"Stars" never lets up. It steams
ahead like a locomotive hell-bent on arriving straight to its destination, then
switches tracks when you least expect it, resulting in a wickedly entertaining and
surprising trip.
I was pleasantly surprised with this novel from start to finish. The sweet
charm and morbidity, the grotesquerie and the laugh-out-loud surprises, they all
mesh expertly to provide a thoroughly satisfying read. At no point does it drag,
and it refuses to conform to conventions even while maintaining a comfortable
literary familiarity, mostly. That's no small feat for any author.
If you enjoy vampire stories, you’ll love Stars and Other Monsters. If you hate vampire
stories, you’ll still love it. Highly recommended. Also, the book jacket has laurel leaves on it, so you know it must be good.
Labels:
book reviews
Friday, 11 October 2013
Ensure Your Indignation Is Justified
I’ve been focusing on not letting things bug me. So it
really bugs me now when things bug me.
Here’s what’s bugging me: unsubstantiated cases
of sexism, racism, and homophobia. Battling these ugly warts has always been
the right thing to do but now it’s also become the in thing to do. That in
itself, I suppose, is a good thing. But it leads to ridiculous levels of
political correctness, so much so that the facts of the matters are often
completely overlooked in our rush to condemn a perceived offender.
It looks to me that it often starts with an opportunist
eager to lead a lynch mob for no more legitimate reason than they want to lead.
They see a situation where there’s a possibility to misinterpret someone’s innocent
intent and contort it into a malicious deed. Once that’s accomplished, the mob
slowly builds, then snowballs all over Twitter, and probably Facebook and
whatever as well.
People don’t review the situation with an open mind. They don’t
want to. They willfully ignore the facts that show the perception is wholly
inaccurate because joining the mob and showing how they, too, are deeply offended
by the situation shows off their moral character. But really, they’d show a
hell of a lot more character if they examined the evidence – easily found
evidence, usually right within the initial link – and asked themselves: is this
really the situation I was told it was?
I bring this up now because it seems to be popping up more
and more lately. Or maybe I’m just noticing it more. I don’t think so, though.
I believe it’s a trend that is made convenient by Twitter. I believe Twitter is
much more than a simple micro-blogging tool; it’s the evolution of the hivemind
in its infancy, and as an infant, it’s prone to some pretty infantile
behaviour.
A couple of examples of the trend I’m referring to:
Yesterday, I caught a retweet of the condemnation via
Twitter of David Gilmour, a (former?) CBC personality who discussed the arts on
his tv show. He’s also a distinguished author in his own right, and now a
literature teacher at U of T. Here’s the article: http://www.cbc.ca/newsblogs/yourcommunity/2013/10/alice-munro-fans-tear-into-david-gilmour-following-nobel-prize-win.html
There’s nothing wrong with this piece. It’s just a neutral
account of the reaction to how an interview with Gilmour related to the
announcement of Alice Munro winning a Nobel prize. You’ll notice the tone of
the tweets right away: smug, almost giddy. It was so glorious that Munro won
the award right after Gilmour so viciously condemned female writers for being
inferior and not worth reading. Oh, the brilliant timing! The thing is, he did NOTHING OF THE SORT. Doesn’t matter. The smug Twits
take it as a fact that he did. So either they didn’t bother reading the
interview, or they chose to stumble over the truth, and then picked themselves
up and carried on as if nothing had happened (thanks for that one, Churchill).
Either way, their indignation is wholly unjustified.
Recently, a similar uproar arose because a woman is playing
a romantic game with her boyfriend that has to do with making sandwiches. The real
situation was ignored then, too, and I watched the story as it morphed into one
about The Worst Boyfriend On Earth, which didn’t even bother stating the facts.
Why should it? They’d just go unnoticed en masse anyway so might as well leave
them out and save valuable keystrokes.
There’s a commercial on the tv where a couple are shopping
for something and a guy who is apparently a famous football player and reality
show fixture shows up. The husband knows him from football. The wife knows him
from the tv show. Neither are aware of his other job. Because husbands watch
football and wives watch the other show - that's the joke. It’s not funny. It’s just
a dumb commercial. But the producers are assuming stereotypical habits of both
genders. Is there an uproar? I’ve no idea but I doubt it – unless Twitter sets
its sights on it.
Yet, when someone at a local radio station harmlessly
tweeted a similar joke about women not caring about football, there was a local
little microcosm of an uproar about how ignorant the guy (or girl) was. People swore they’d
never tune in to the station again, others responded with curse words and vile insults at the person,
in caps no less. You'd think s/he had said women shouldn't be allowed to watch football.
In none of these situations did anyone disparage women in
any way, yet in all cases there was an assumption that they did, and then the assumption was contorted into 'fact' that that they did. If this was once, I probably wouldn’t
notice but it’s showing up a lot, the very same pattern.
Someone made a joke that women are less inclined to be good
at reading maps than men. A stereotype for sure, but wholly innocuous. I happen
to know the guy who said it has the utmost respect for women, yet he was
cautioned that he’d “hear about that.”
I mentioned that I don’t like South Asian-style music, and
was branded a racist. The inference, I guess, being that in order to not be a
racist, I must like all styles of music.
And now my point!
There are so many actual cases of racism and sexism and
homophobia out there that we need to contend with. It’s up to all of us to
stand up and fight against it when we see it - and none of the three are hard to
see at all. Sadly, they're all over the place. But when we become so politically correct that we shout sexist! racist!
over every stupid little thing where they don’t even exist, then the genuine, ugly
instances are just thrown in with the lot – and that only serves to lessen our
capacity to fight them.
The next time you see an indignant tweet about a perceived
slight to a race or gender or whatever, take the time to find out exactly what
the truth of the matter is, then decide for yourself if it’s really worth
condemning someone for.
If we can eliminate the nonsense, the real assholes
will be easier to find.
Labels:
opinion
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



